Show Navigation

Search Results

Refine Search
Match all words
Match any word
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
search all images)
{ 48 images found }

Loading ()...

  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 091.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 179.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 131.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 093.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 137.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 136.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 127.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 125.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 116.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 113.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 073.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 068.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Every weekend Mike Holt takes his dad out to brunch. This Sunday the two went to Rudy's Family Restaurant in Harrington, DE...Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 062.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Every weekend Mike Holt takes his dad out to brunch. This Sunday the two went to Rudy's Family Restaurant in Harrington, DE...Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 049.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Every weekend Mike Holt takes his dad out to brunch. This Sunday the two went to Rudy's Family Restaurant in Harrington, DE...Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 042.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 163.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 125.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Every weekend Mike Holt takes his dad out to brunch. This Sunday the two went to Rudy's Family Restaurant in Harrington, DE...Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 042.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 187.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 176.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 163.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 140.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 125.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 097.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 090.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 030.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 022.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 172.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 146.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 145.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 126.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 123.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 114.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 106.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 098.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Every weekend Mike Holt takes his dad out to brunch. This Sunday the two went to Rudy's Family Restaurant in Harrington, DE...Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 036.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Every weekend Mike Holt takes his dad out to brunch. This Sunday the two went to Rudy's Family Restaurant in Harrington, DE...Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 035.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 172.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 141.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 127.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 066.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 060.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 054.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Martha Layanna and her daughter Mary are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $10,000) from Medicare because Martha was, according to them,  improperly classified as an "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Martha and Mary are photographed in Martha's other daughter's home in Newark, Delaware Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Martha Leyanna 046.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 165.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 129.JPG
  • photo by Matt Roth..Delaware residents Charles Holt and his son Mike are part of a class action law suit trying to recoup lost money (approximately $5,000) from Medicare because Charles was, according to them,  improperly classified as "observation," rather than "in patient." Under the rules of Medicare, more bills are covered under the latter. Charles and Mike are photographed at the Heritage at Milford assisted living community, where Charles lives Sunday, August 19, 2012.
    120819 Observed Charles Holt 121.JPG
  • (staff photo by Matt Roth)..Under the observation of Marriotts Ridge head coach Paul Eckert, left, Ethan Rice, a junior, loses control of, not only a grounder, but his hat during infield practice of the first day of tryouts for the returning varsity and jv Marriotts Ridge baseball teams Saturday, February 28, 2009. In a knee-jerk reaction, junior, Kevin Kratochwill, seen in front of sophomore Joey Sipocz, both in the background, flashes his glove..
    090228Tryouts1200.jpg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
x

Matt Roth Baltimore Photographer Editorial & Commercial

  • Portfolio
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archive
    • All Galleries
    • Search
    • Cart
    • Lightbox
    • Client Area
  • Instagram
  • tumblr